<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Rob Eberhardt</title>
    <link>http://blog.throbs.net/</link>
    <description>cleverness ensues</description>
    
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Robert Eberhardt</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:08:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.8.5223.1</generator>
    <managingEditor>blog@throbs.net</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>blog@throbs.net</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=944ff7f1-f17c-48d8-a6b3-86e1e8d835fb</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,944ff7f1-f17c-48d8-a6b3-86e1e8d835fb.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>myemail@myemail.com (Your DisplayName here!)</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,944ff7f1-f17c-48d8-a6b3-86e1e8d835fb.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=944ff7f1-f17c-48d8-a6b3-86e1e8d835fb</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
   In case anyone needs this, I found that this (quite batchable) command opens the XPSP2
   Firewall appropriately so Symantec Management Console can push SAV licenses to workstations:<br /><br /><code style="border: 3px ridge rgb(255, 255, 255); padding: 1ex; display: block; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Courier New',monospace; font-size: small;"> &gt;
   netsh firewall set portopening TCP 2967 "Symantec AntiVirus Client Management" enable
   subnet<br /></code><br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=944ff7f1-f17c-48d8-a6b3-86e1e8d835fb" /><br /><hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>Push Symantec licenses through XP Firewall</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,944ff7f1-f17c-48d8-a6b3-86e1e8d835fb.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2008/02/06/Push+Symantec+Licenses+Through+XP+Firewall.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:08:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
In case anyone needs this, I found that this (quite batchable) command opens the XPSP2
Firewall appropriately so Symantec Management Console can push SAV licenses to workstations:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;code style="border: 3px ridge rgb(255, 255, 255); padding: 1ex; display: block; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'Courier New',monospace; font-size: small;"&gt; &amp;gt;
netsh firewall set portopening TCP 2967 "Symantec AntiVirus Client Management" enable
subnet&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/code&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=944ff7f1-f17c-48d8-a6b3-86e1e8d835fb" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,944ff7f1-f17c-48d8-a6b3-86e1e8d835fb.aspx</comments>
      <category>tech issues of the moment;tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=7f0af465-0044-4ed1-aff9-28e41114801b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,7f0af465-0044-4ed1-aff9-28e41114801b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,7f0af465-0044-4ed1-aff9-28e41114801b.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=7f0af465-0044-4ed1-aff9-28e41114801b</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Via <a href="http://www.hedgerwow.com/360/bugs/css-select-free.html">Dean Edwards'
      Links</a>, meet <a href="http://www.hedgerwow.com/">HedgerWow's</a><a href="http://www.hedgerwow.com/360/bugs/css-select-free.html">&lt;SELECT&gt;-Free
      Layer</a>, a <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym>-only workaround
      for <a href="http://throbs.net/web/articles/IE-SELECT-bugs/#ieSELECTzindex">Internet
      Explorer's SELECT bug with z-index</a>. 
   </p>
        <p>
      It's not quite clear from the demo, but I think the magic is an absolutely-positioned
      + transparent + huge IFRAME inside the layer to show.  C'est trés hacky, but
      it still seems better (in a way) than the usual dynamic hide/show javascript approach. 
   </p>
        <p>
      Here's hoping that Microsoft will quickly windows-update us all with <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/01/17/514076.aspx">IE7
      (which fixes this bug, hoorah)</a>, and free us of these sHACKles. 
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=7f0af465-0044-4ed1-aff9-28e41114801b" />
        <br />
        <hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>Dev tip: CSS-only workaround for IE SELECT Z-index bug</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,7f0af465-0044-4ed1-aff9-28e41114801b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2006/03/31/Dev+Tip+CSSonly+Workaround+For+IE+SELECT+Zindex+Bug.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Via &lt;a href="http://www.hedgerwow.com/360/bugs/css-select-free.html"&gt;Dean Edwards'
   Links&lt;/a&gt;, meet &lt;a href="http://www.hedgerwow.com/"&gt;HedgerWow's&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.hedgerwow.com/360/bugs/css-select-free.html"&gt;&amp;lt;SELECT&amp;gt;-Free
   Layer&lt;/a&gt;, a &lt;acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets"&gt;CSS&lt;/acronym&gt;-only workaround
   for &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/web/articles/IE-SELECT-bugs/#ieSELECTzindex"&gt;Internet
   Explorer's SELECT bug with z-index&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   It's not quite clear from the demo, but I think the magic is an absolutely-positioned
   + transparent + huge IFRAME inside the layer to show.&amp;nbsp; C'est trés hacky, but
   it still seems better (in a way) than the usual dynamic hide/show javascript approach. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Here's hoping that Microsoft will quickly windows-update us all with &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/01/17/514076.aspx"&gt;IE7
   (which fixes this bug, hoorah)&lt;/a&gt;, and free us of these sHACKles. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=7f0af465-0044-4ed1-aff9-28e41114801b" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,7f0af465-0044-4ed1-aff9-28e41114801b.aspx</comments>
      <category>web/dev/tech;tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=561579a5-3abe-4583-b042-a30a6c954b5b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,561579a5-3abe-4583-b042-a30a6c954b5b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,561579a5-3abe-4583-b042-a30a6c954b5b.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=561579a5-3abe-4583-b042-a30a6c954b5b</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Something I bumped into today: The <em>first</em> time Internet Explorer loads a URL,
      it sends an "HTTP_Accept" request header with the list of MIME types it accepts, like
      so: <code>HTTP_ACCEPT = application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/msword,
      */*</code></p>
        <p>
      Any <em>subsequent</em> request of the same URL, though, only sends "*/*": <code>HTTP_ACCEPT
      = */*</code></p>
        <p>
      Of course I watched this through an <acronym title="Active Server Pages">ASP</acronym> page
      which wrote out <code>Request.ServerVariables("HTTP_Accept")</code>.  I wasn't
      sure if it was <acronym title="Internet Information Services">IIS</acronym> or <acronym title="Internet Explorer">IE</acronym>'s
      fault tho, so I checked the raw headers with <a href="http://www.fiddlertool.com/fiddler/" title="Fiddler (HTTP Debugging tool)">Fiddler</a>,
      and it's definitely <acronym title="Internet Explorer">IE</acronym>. 
   </p>
        <p>
      What's especially strange is that I can find little or no mention of the problem.
      Anyone else heard of (or conquered) this? 
   </p>
        <p>
      It <em>rather</em> messes up a page I'm working on... 
   </p>
        <p>
      UPDATE: <a href="http://throbs.net/web/articles/IE_Bug_with_HTTP_ACCEPT_header_and_Workaround.asp" title="IE bug with HTTP_ACCEPT HTTP header, and workaround">See
      here for a bug and workaround demo article I just put together.</a><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=561579a5-3abe-4583-b042-a30a6c954b5b" /><br /><hr />
      Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></p>
      </body>
      <title>IE6 HTTP Bug with HTTP_Accept request header</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,561579a5-3abe-4583-b042-a30a6c954b5b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2006/02/09/IE6+HTTP+Bug+With+HTTPAccept+Request+Header.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Something I bumped into today: The &lt;em&gt;first&lt;/em&gt; time Internet Explorer loads a URL,
   it sends an "HTTP_Accept" request header with the list of MIME types it accepts, like
   so: &lt;code&gt;HTTP_ACCEPT = application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/msword,
   */*&lt;/code&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
   Any &lt;em&gt;subsequent&lt;/em&gt; request of the same URL, though, only sends "*/*": &lt;code&gt;HTTP_ACCEPT
   = */*&lt;/code&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Of course I watched this through an &lt;acronym title="Active Server Pages"&gt;ASP&lt;/acronym&gt; page
   which wrote out &lt;code&gt;Request.ServerVariables("HTTP_Accept")&lt;/code&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I wasn't
   sure if it was &lt;acronym title="Internet Information Services"&gt;IIS&lt;/acronym&gt; or &lt;acronym title="Internet Explorer"&gt;IE&lt;/acronym&gt;'s
   fault tho, so I checked the raw headers with &lt;a href="http://www.fiddlertool.com/fiddler/" title="Fiddler (HTTP Debugging tool)"&gt;Fiddler&lt;/a&gt;,
   and it's definitely &lt;acronym title="Internet Explorer"&gt;IE&lt;/acronym&gt;. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   What's especially strange is that I can find little or no mention of the problem.
   Anyone else heard of (or conquered) this? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   It &lt;em&gt;rather&lt;/em&gt; messes up a page I'm working on... 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   UPDATE: &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/web/articles/IE_Bug_with_HTTP_ACCEPT_header_and_Workaround.asp" title="IE bug with HTTP_ACCEPT HTTP header, and workaround"&gt;See
   here for a bug and workaround demo article I just put together.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=561579a5-3abe-4583-b042-a30a6c954b5b" /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;hr /&gt;
   Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,561579a5-3abe-4583-b042-a30a6c954b5b.aspx</comments>
      <category>tools/tips/hacks;tech issues of the moment</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=ac81c976-659a-4414-8409-46bb4ba1fc0a</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,ac81c976-659a-4414-8409-46bb4ba1fc0a.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,ac81c976-659a-4414-8409-46bb4ba1fc0a.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=ac81c976-659a-4414-8409-46bb4ba1fc0a</wfw:commentRss>
      <title>Dev Tip: Rounded Corner Generator</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,ac81c976-659a-4414-8409-46bb4ba1fc0a.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/10/12/Dev+Tip+Rounded+Corner+Generator.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Got a question today from my friend George about the best way to make rounded corners.&amp;nbsp;
   I listed some choices, with pros/cons of each: 
&lt;ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      Create static images with Photoshop/Paint Shop Pro (compatible, simple, but painstaking)&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      A &lt;a href="http://www.planet-source-code.com/vb/scripts/ShowCode.asp?lngWId=4&amp;txtCodeId=6619" title="Lewis Moten's Dynamic Curve Images with ASP"&gt;dynamic
      server-side solution&lt;/a&gt; (easy for the lazy, but creates extra server load)&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://pro.html.it/articoli/id_599/idcat_31/pag_1/" title="rounded corners without IMGs"&gt;"Nifty
      corners"&lt;/a&gt; (no separate server hit, but quite hacky code)&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2005/06/base64-ie/" title="Dean Edwards' hack for IE"&gt;Base64-encoded
      images&lt;/a&gt; (way hacky, and falls back to dynamic for &lt;a title="" href="" &gt;&lt;acronym title="Internet Explorer"&gt;IE&lt;/acronym&gt;&lt;/a&gt; anyway)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I ended up recommending static images as the best combination of performance and compatibility,
   at the expense of developer time.&amp;nbsp; Then it occurred to me: surely I'm not the
   only lazy one -- someone must've already made a web-based wizard to quickly create
   sets of corner images for download and installation.&amp;nbsp; Could it be?? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Google says Voila!&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://jalenack.com/roundedstage/" title="Thank you Andrew Sutherland"&gt;Jalenack's
   Complete Rounded Corners Creator&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I say &lt;em&gt;Sweet!&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp; I tell ya, kids these days got it easy! 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=ac81c976-659a-4414-8409-46bb4ba1fc0a" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,ac81c976-659a-4414-8409-46bb4ba1fc0a.aspx</comments>
      <category>web/dev/tech;tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=7d447b7b-a300-4732-9176-218b7ae03070</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,7d447b7b-a300-4732-9176-218b7ae03070.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,7d447b7b-a300-4732-9176-218b7ae03070.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=7d447b7b-a300-4732-9176-218b7ae03070</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Via <a href="http://www.peterprovost.org/">Peter Provost</a>, how to change your <a href="http://www.peterprovost.org/archive/2004/09/01/1837.Aspx">VirtualPC
      Default Folder</a>. 
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=7d447b7b-a300-4732-9176-218b7ae03070" />
        <br />
        <hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>Tip: How to change your Virtual PC Default Folder</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,7d447b7b-a300-4732-9176-218b7ae03070.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/10/10/Tip+How+To+Change+Your+Virtual+PC+Default+Folder.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Via &lt;a href="http://www.peterprovost.org/"&gt;Peter Provost&lt;/a&gt;, how to change your &lt;a href="http://www.peterprovost.org/archive/2004/09/01/1837.Aspx"&gt;VirtualPC
   Default Folder&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=7d447b7b-a300-4732-9176-218b7ae03070" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,7d447b7b-a300-4732-9176-218b7ae03070.aspx</comments>
      <category>tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=af4a41e4-120e-455a-bf5d-2be5760e62d1</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,af4a41e4-120e-455a-bf5d-2be5760e62d1.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,af4a41e4-120e-455a-bf5d-2be5760e62d1.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=af4a41e4-120e-455a-bf5d-2be5760e62d1</wfw:commentRss>
      <title>Discovered: MS-DOS 7.10, hrm?!</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,af4a41e4-120e-455a-bf5d-2be5760e62d1.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/10/04/Discovered+MSDOS+710+Hrm.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Apparently &lt;a href="http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:v0-DAYI9pNsJ:mike.warpedbelief.com/dos/msdos71/index.htm+%22Mini-Windows+98+GUI&amp;hl=en" title="Google cache: MS-DOS 7.10 Download"&gt;someone&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.computing.net/windows31/wwwboard/forum/10878.html" title="What exactly IS this MS-DOS 7.1"&gt;ripped
   out the underlying DOS from Windows 98 and made it work as a standalone OS&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;
   (Unfortunately, the main site is down, but there's a &lt;a href="http://www.peteweb.com/index.php?showtopic=3987" title="PeteWeb.com Forums - Old Operating System Links"&gt;good
   info &amp;amp; a download mirror here&lt;/a&gt;.) 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Why, you ask? So you can keep using old hardware, but with &lt;a href="http://www.computing.net/dos/wwwboard/forum/14254.html"&gt;better
   disk support, FAT32, drivers, etc.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Fun stuff.&amp;nbsp; I've already installed it.&amp;nbsp; I'm looking forward to silliness
   like running the Windows 3.1 shell on top of it!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Links:&lt;br /&gt;
   Main info site (seems to be down): &lt;a href="http://mike.warpedbelief.com/dos/msdos71/index.htm"&gt;MS-DOS
   7.10 Download&lt;/a&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
   Main info site (google cache): &lt;a href="http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:v0-DAYI9pNsJ:mike.warpedbelief.com/dos/msdos71/index.htm+%22Mini-Windows+98+GUI&amp;hl=en"&gt;MS-DOS
   7.10 Download&lt;/a&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
   Download Mirror: &lt;a href="http://www.peteweb.com/index.php?showtopic=3987"&gt;PeteWeb.com
   Forums - Old Operating System Links&lt;/a&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=af4a41e4-120e-455a-bf5d-2be5760e62d1" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,af4a41e4-120e-455a-bf5d-2be5760e62d1.aspx</comments>
      <category>tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=b3834bf4-f3fe-4232-96b1-b6ea9371cd33</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,b3834bf4-f3fe-4232-96b1-b6ea9371cd33.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,b3834bf4-f3fe-4232-96b1-b6ea9371cd33.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b3834bf4-f3fe-4232-96b1-b6ea9371cd33</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <h4>Problem:
   </h4>
        <p>
      My <acronym title="Small Business Server">SBS</acronym> 2003 box was getting this
      error several times a day: "IPBOOTP was unable to receive an incoming message on the
      local interface with IP address x.x.x.x . The data is the error code." 
   </p>
        <h4>Process:
   </h4>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=2003+IPBOOTP+was+unable+to+receive+an+incoming+message">Most
      applicable suggestions I found</a> said to either disable the DHCP Relay Agent <em>service</em>,
      or install a Win2000 hotfix.  No luck for me, though, since the service wasn't
      installed, and I'm on <em>SBS 2003</em>. 
   </p>
        <h4>Solution:
   </h4>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.tech-archive.net/Archive/Windows/microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs/2004-07/8023.html">Microsoft.Public
      Usenet - IPBOOTP ERROR PLEASE HELP</a>.  Hurrah, disabling DHCP Relay on the
      LAN interface in RRAS manager. 
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=b3834bf4-f3fe-4232-96b1-b6ea9371cd33" />
        <br />
        <hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>2005-10-01 - IPBOOTB errors</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,b3834bf4-f3fe-4232-96b1-b6ea9371cd33.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/10/02/20051001++IPBOOTB+Errors.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 03:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;h4&gt;Problem:
&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   My &lt;acronym title="Small Business Server"&gt;SBS&lt;/acronym&gt; 2003 box was getting this
   error several times a day: "IPBOOTP was unable to receive an incoming message on the
   local interface with IP address x.x.x.x . The data is the error code." 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h4&gt;Process:
&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=2003+IPBOOTP+was+unable+to+receive+an+incoming+message"&gt;Most
   applicable suggestions I found&lt;/a&gt; said to either disable the DHCP Relay Agent &lt;em&gt;service&lt;/em&gt;,
   or install a Win2000 hotfix.&amp;nbsp; No luck for me, though, since the service wasn't
   installed, and I'm on &lt;em&gt;SBS 2003&lt;/em&gt;. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h4&gt;Solution:
&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;a href="http://www.tech-archive.net/Archive/Windows/microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs/2004-07/8023.html"&gt;Microsoft.Public
   Usenet - IPBOOTP ERROR PLEASE HELP&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Hurrah, disabling DHCP Relay on the
   LAN interface in RRAS manager. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=b3834bf4-f3fe-4232-96b1-b6ea9371cd33" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,b3834bf4-f3fe-4232-96b1-b6ea9371cd33.aspx</comments>
      <category>tools/tips/hacks;tech issues of the moment</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=8ef3797d-2cb1-4327-ae26-b11e6d0d0b61</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,8ef3797d-2cb1-4327-ae26-b11e6d0d0b61.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,8ef3797d-2cb1-4327-ae26-b11e6d0d0b61.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8ef3797d-2cb1-4327-ae26-b11e6d0d0b61</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      That's a Windows registry key, found under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal
      Server (at least on XP and 2003 Server). 
   </p>
        <p>
      There are <a href="http://www.wtstek.com/item2/Article20031210.htm">Terminal Server
      registry reference docs</a> out there, but no explanation what that one does. 
      Hello world, any ideas? 
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=8ef3797d-2cb1-4327-ae26-b11e6d0d0b61" />
        <br />
        <hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>spider bait: fEnableSalem</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,8ef3797d-2cb1-4327-ae26-b11e6d0d0b61.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/08/05/spider+Bait+FEnableSalem.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   That's a Windows registry key, found under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal
   Server (at least on XP and 2003 Server). 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   There are &lt;a href="http://www.wtstek.com/item2/Article20031210.htm"&gt;Terminal Server
   registry reference docs&lt;/a&gt; out there, but no explanation what that one does.&amp;nbsp;
   Hello world, any ideas? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=8ef3797d-2cb1-4327-ae26-b11e6d0d0b61" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,8ef3797d-2cb1-4327-ae26-b11e6d0d0b61.aspx</comments>
      <category>tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=c6788f58-8eeb-4c85-a378-0379b0b79616</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,c6788f58-8eeb-4c85-a378-0379b0b79616.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,c6788f58-8eeb-4c85-a378-0379b0b79616.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c6788f58-8eeb-4c85-a378-0379b0b79616</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <a href="http://code4ward.com/">Stefan Koell</a> just released <a href="http://www.code4ward.net/CS/blogs/c4w/articles/royalts.aspx">RoyalTS
      version 1.3</a>.  This takes care of the few obvious issues and makes it a fairly
      mature tool.  
   </p>
        <p>
      It's still <a href="http://blog.throbs.net/archive/2005/05/03/174.aspx">a great tool
      for Remote Desktop/Terminal Server administration</a> (better than Microsoft's RDC
      or Remote Desktops snapin), and getting better.  If you control more than a couple
      machines, you should <a href="http://www.code4ward.net/CS/blogs/c4w/articles/royalts.aspx">add
      RoyalTS to your toolkit now</a>! 
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=c6788f58-8eeb-4c85-a378-0379b0b79616" />
        <br />
        <hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>New version of RoyalTS</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,c6788f58-8eeb-4c85-a378-0379b0b79616.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/06/27/New+Version+Of+RoyalTS.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;a href="http://code4ward.com/"&gt;Stefan Koell&lt;/a&gt; just released &lt;a href="http://www.code4ward.net/CS/blogs/c4w/articles/royalts.aspx"&gt;RoyalTS
   version 1.3&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; This takes care of the few obvious issues and makes it a fairly
   mature tool.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   It's still &lt;a href="http://blog.throbs.net/archive/2005/05/03/174.aspx"&gt;a great tool
   for Remote Desktop/Terminal Server administration&lt;/a&gt; (better than Microsoft's RDC
   or Remote Desktops snapin), and getting better.&amp;nbsp; If you control more than a couple
   machines, you should &lt;a href="http://www.code4ward.net/CS/blogs/c4w/articles/royalts.aspx"&gt;add
   RoyalTS to your toolkit now&lt;/a&gt;! 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=c6788f58-8eeb-4c85-a378-0379b0b79616" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,c6788f58-8eeb-4c85-a378-0379b0b79616.aspx</comments>
      <category>tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=41b3dc63-e79f-4e7a-bb9f-521f6836a4eb</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,41b3dc63-e79f-4e7a-bb9f-521f6836a4eb.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,41b3dc63-e79f-4e7a-bb9f-521f6836a4eb.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=41b3dc63-e79f-4e7a-bb9f-521f6836a4eb</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <br />
      It requires modifying the installation CD (just two bytes), but for the brave: <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/howto-change-windows-xp-home-to-windows-xp-pro-105486.php">HOWTO
      Change Windows XP Home to Windows XP Pro - Gizmodo</a></p>
        <p>
      Lessee, judging by Microsoft's <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/howtobuy/choosing2.mspx">Windows
      XP Comparison Guide</a>, that <em>should</em> get you: 
   </p>
        <ul>
          <li>
            <strike>System Restore</strike>
          </li>
          <li>
         NTBackup</li>
          <li>
            <strike>Fast User Switching</strike>
          </li>
          <li>
         Offline Files</li>
          <li>
         Remote Desktop</li>
          <li>
         hardware support (Dynamic Disks, Multiple Processors)</li>
          <li>
         security (Access Control, <acronym title="Encrypting File System">EFS</acronym>)</li>
          <li>
            <acronym title="Internet Information Server">IIS</acronym>, and 
      </li>
          <li>
         domain support (Group Policy, Assigned Software Installation, Roaming Profiles, <acronym title="Remote Installation Service">RIS</acronym>).</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
      Of these features, everything but IIS and domain support can be useful to many home
      users.  <strike>In particular, there's no way the first three -- System Restore,
      NTBackup, and Fast User Switching -- should have ever been left out of XP Home --
      ALL users could benefit from them.</strike><em>Whoops, had some bad info before I
      checked the XP Comparison Guide (and I was caught editing, so I can't just erase it
      now!  Good catch Ed!) -- It looks like FUS and System Restore <em>are</em> in
      XP Home. My opinion stands for NTBackup and Remote Desktop, tho.</em></p>
        <p>
      For those less venturesome (or unwilling to reinstall), it <em>is</em> possible to
      install NTBackup on XP Home.  See <a href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/">Ed
      Bott</a>'s "<a href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000238.html">The amazing
      hidden backup program</a>".
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=41b3dc63-e79f-4e7a-bb9f-521f6836a4eb" />
        <br />
        <hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>Change Windows XP Home to XP Pro</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,41b3dc63-e79f-4e7a-bb9f-521f6836a4eb.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/06/02/Change+Windows+XP+Home+To+XP+Pro.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
   It requires modifying the installation CD (just two bytes), but for the brave: &lt;a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/howto-change-windows-xp-home-to-windows-xp-pro-105486.php"&gt;HOWTO
   Change Windows XP Home to Windows XP Pro - Gizmodo&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Lessee, judging by Microsoft's &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/howtobuy/choosing2.mspx"&gt;Windows
   XP Comparison Guide&lt;/a&gt;, that &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; get you: 
&lt;ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;strike&gt;System Restore&lt;/strike&gt;
   &lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      NTBackup&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;strike&gt;Fast User Switching&lt;/strike&gt;
   &lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      Offline Files&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      Remote Desktop&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      hardware support (Dynamic Disks, Multiple Processors)&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      security (Access Control, &lt;acronym title="Encrypting File System"&gt;EFS&lt;/acronym&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;acronym title="Internet Information Server"&gt;IIS&lt;/acronym&gt;, and 
   &lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      domain support (Group Policy, Assigned Software Installation, Roaming Profiles, &lt;acronym title="Remote Installation Service"&gt;RIS&lt;/acronym&gt;).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Of these features, everything but IIS and domain support can be useful to many home
   users.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strike&gt;In particular, there's no way the first three -- System Restore,
   NTBackup, and Fast User Switching -- should have ever been left out of XP Home --
   ALL users could benefit from them.&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;em&gt;Whoops, had some bad info before I
   checked the XP Comparison Guide (and I was caught editing, so I can't just erase it
   now!&amp;nbsp; Good catch Ed!) -- It looks like FUS and System Restore &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; in
   XP Home. My opinion stands for NTBackup and Remote Desktop, tho.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   For those less venturesome (or unwilling to reinstall), it &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; possible to
   install NTBackup on XP Home.&amp;nbsp; See &lt;a href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/"&gt;Ed
   Bott&lt;/a&gt;'s "&lt;a href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000238.html"&gt;The amazing
   hidden backup program&lt;/a&gt;".
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=41b3dc63-e79f-4e7a-bb9f-521f6836a4eb" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,41b3dc63-e79f-4e7a-bb9f-521f6836a4eb.aspx</comments>
      <category>tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=c0fd69e2-e7f3-45cd-ad24-85adfc381e19</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,c0fd69e2-e7f3-45cd-ad24-85adfc381e19.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,c0fd69e2-e7f3-45cd-ad24-85adfc381e19.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c0fd69e2-e7f3-45cd-ad24-85adfc381e19</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <br />
        <p class="imgWrapper" style="padding-bottom:3px;">
          <img src="/resources/Thank you for choosing Acrobat Reader!.PNG" alt="---------------------------&#xA;Information&#xA;---------------------------&#xA;Thank you for choosing Acrobat Reader!&#xA;---------------------------&#xA;OK   &#xA;---------------------------" />
        </p>
        <p>
          <em>"choosing"</em>
        </p>
        <p>
      Hey, how come people don't bash Macromedia's monopoly/success?
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=c0fd69e2-e7f3-45cd-ad24-85adfc381e19" />
        <br />
        <hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>As if I really had a choice.</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,c0fd69e2-e7f3-45cd-ad24-85adfc381e19.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/06/01/As+If+I+Really+Had+A+Choice.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 02:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p class="imgWrapper" style="padding-bottom:3px;"&gt;
   &lt;img src="/resources/Thank you for choosing Acrobat Reader!.PNG" alt="---------------------------
Information
---------------------------
Thank you for choosing Acrobat Reader!
---------------------------
OK   
---------------------------" /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;em&gt;"choosing"&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Hey, how come people don't bash Macromedia's monopoly/success?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=c0fd69e2-e7f3-45cd-ad24-85adfc381e19" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,c0fd69e2-e7f3-45cd-ad24-85adfc381e19.aspx</comments>
      <category>tools/tips/hacks;broken/WTF</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=e9661d06-a5b4-417b-82ed-9addd2079752</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,e9661d06-a5b4-417b-82ed-9addd2079752.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,e9661d06-a5b4-417b-82ed-9addd2079752.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=e9661d06-a5b4-417b-82ed-9addd2079752</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Microsoft currently has two official RDP clients:  <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/tools/rdclientdl.mspx">Remote
      Desktop Client</a> (built-in to Windows XP Pro, and downloadable for nearly anything
      else), and the Remote Desktops MMC snapin (from the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=C16AE515-C8F4-47EF-A1E4-A8DCBACFF8E3&amp;displaylang=en">Windows
      2003 Administration Tools Pack</a>).
   </p>
        <p>
      They have all the right features <em>between them</em>, but neither has all of
      them in one place.  The Remote Desktop Client has the most options, but can't
      connect to console session (aka "session 0") and is meant for one remote connection
      at a time.  The Remote Desktops Snap-in can do these two things, but is missing <em>tons</em> of
      other options, plus one especially dumb limitation:  It can't connect to a port
      other than standard 3389.  (It gives an error “<em>The server name cannot
      contain the following characters: spaces, tabs , ;  :  " &lt; &gt;
      * + = \ | ? ,</em>”  -- Another over-zealous coder under-thinking his validation
      logic!) 
   </p>
        <blockquote style="padding:0 2em;"> Update: 
   <p>
      Microsoft says the <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;278845" title="Q278845: How to Connect to and Shadow the Console Session with Windows Server 2003 Terminal Services">Remote
      Desktop Client <em>can</em> connect to the console session, via a command-line switch</a>. 
      Not sure why it's not a checkbox on the options dialog <strike>, but it doesn't work
      for me anyway.  It removes the %sessionname% environment variable, but Terminal
      Services Manager still shows the session is a "RDP-TCP#" name.  Oh well.</strike> (turns
      out the console session has to already be logged in). 
   </p><p>
      Something else I found: you can't connect to the console remotely with a non-admin
      account -- it gives you an error that "To log on to this remote console session, you
      must have administrative permissions on this computer." 
   </p></blockquote>
        <p>
      The standalone Client is best when you're working in-depth on one remote machine. 
      The Snap-in is better for when you're working lightly on several machines, and don't
      need the extra options.  In daily use, I usually find myself switching between
      the Snap-in and the Client.  It's a small but constant pain.
   </p>
        <p>
      This is all to say that I just found <a href="http://www.code4ward.net/CS/blogs/c4w/articles/royalts.aspx"><strong>Royal
      TS</strong></a> from <a href="http://www.code4ward.net/">code4ward</a>, which is a
      free, open-source (C#) app, which attempts to combine the best of both programs.
       (It's like the Snap-in interface, but on steroids.)  
   </p>
        <p>
      I've been using it for a few days, and it's very good.  I only wish it could
      do a better full-screen, or use less screen real-estate with the embedded view. 
      I may try my hand at C# just to hack it up.
   </p>
        <p>
      Hm, the author's site is down now.  Hopefully it's temporary.  Meanwhile,
      here is is on Snapfiles: <a href="http://www.snapfiles.com/get/royalts.html">http://www.snapfiles.com/get/royalts.html</a></p>
        <p>
       
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=e9661d06-a5b4-417b-82ed-9addd2079752" />
        <br />
        <hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>A better RDP client: Royal TS</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,e9661d06-a5b4-417b-82ed-9addd2079752.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/05/03/A+Better+RDP+Client+Royal+TS.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 19:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Microsoft currently has two&amp;nbsp;official RDP clients:&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/tools/rdclientdl.mspx"&gt;Remote
   Desktop Client&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(built-in to Windows XP Pro, and downloadable for nearly anything
   else), and the Remote Desktops MMC snapin (from the &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=C16AE515-C8F4-47EF-A1E4-A8DCBACFF8E3&amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;Windows
   2003 Administration Tools Pack&lt;/a&gt;).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   They&amp;nbsp;have all the right features &lt;em&gt;between them&lt;/em&gt;, but neither has all of
   them in one place.&amp;nbsp; The Remote Desktop Client has the most options, but can't
   connect to console session (aka "session 0") and is meant for one remote connection
   at a time.&amp;nbsp; The Remote Desktops Snap-in can do these two things, but is missing &lt;em&gt;tons&lt;/em&gt; of
   other options, plus one especially dumb limitation:&amp;nbsp; It can't connect to a port
   other than standard 3389.&amp;nbsp; (It gives an error &amp;#8220;&lt;em&gt;The server name cannot
   contain the following characters:&amp;nbsp;spaces, tabs , ;&amp;nbsp; :&amp;nbsp; " &amp;lt; &amp;gt;
   * + = \ | ? ,&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8221;&amp;nbsp; -- Another over-zealous coder under-thinking his validation
   logic!) 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote style="padding:0 2em;"&gt; Update: 
&lt;p&gt;
   Microsoft says the &lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;278845" title="Q278845: How to Connect to and Shadow the Console Session with Windows Server 2003 Terminal Services"&gt;Remote
   Desktop Client &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; connect to the console session, via a command-line switch&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;
   Not sure why it's not a checkbox on the options dialog &lt;strike&gt;, but it doesn't work
   for me anyway.&amp;nbsp; It removes the %sessionname% environment variable, but Terminal
   Services Manager still shows the session is a "RDP-TCP#" name.&amp;nbsp; Oh well.&lt;/strike&gt; (turns
   out the console session has to already be logged in).&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Something else I found: you can't connect to the console remotely with a non-admin
   account -- it gives you an error that "To log on to this remote console session, you
   must have administrative permissions on this computer." 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
   The standalone Client is best when you're working in-depth on one remote machine.&amp;nbsp;
   The Snap-in is better for when you're working lightly on several machines, and don't
   need the extra options.&amp;nbsp; In daily use, I usually find myself switching between
   the Snap-in and the Client.&amp;nbsp; It's a small but constant pain.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   This is all to say that I just found &lt;a href="http://www.code4ward.net/CS/blogs/c4w/articles/royalts.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Royal
   TS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href="http://www.code4ward.net/"&gt;code4ward&lt;/a&gt;, which is a
   free, open-source&amp;nbsp;(C#) app, which attempts to combine the best of both programs.
   &amp;nbsp;(It's like the Snap-in interface, but&amp;nbsp;on steroids.)&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I've been using it for a few days, and it's very good.&amp;nbsp; I only wish it could
   do a better full-screen, or use less screen real-estate with the embedded view.&amp;nbsp;
   I may try my hand at C# just to hack it up.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Hm, the author's site is&amp;nbsp;down now.&amp;nbsp; Hopefully it's temporary.&amp;nbsp; Meanwhile,
   here is is on Snapfiles: &lt;a href="http://www.snapfiles.com/get/royalts.html"&gt;http://www.snapfiles.com/get/royalts.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=e9661d06-a5b4-417b-82ed-9addd2079752" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,e9661d06-a5b4-417b-82ed-9addd2079752.aspx</comments>
      <category>tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=c6931ebf-a160-492d-b645-ebbb82e6f255</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,c6931ebf-a160-492d-b645-ebbb82e6f255.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,c6931ebf-a160-492d-b645-ebbb82e6f255.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c6931ebf-a160-492d-b645-ebbb82e6f255</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      It's possible after all.  XP Pro's Remote Desktop can be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hack_%28technology_slang%29">hack</a>ed
      to give concurrent sessions.
   </p>
        <p>
      To explain:  <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/mobility/getstarted/remoteintro.mspx">Windows
      XP's Remote Desktop rocks</a>, as does its ability to give me my console session later (with
      my work uninterrupted) from another machine.  Glaring in its absence, though,
      is the ability to <strong>remotely</strong>-rock <em>while </em>someone is <strong>locally</strong>-rocking
      the machine.  This can stink in a big way.  
   </p>
        <p>
      For example, too often I've remotely logged in for something quick, only to see this
      nuisance:
   </p>
        <p class="imgWrapper">
          <img src="/resources/XP_RD_unconcurrent.png" alt="---------------------------&#xA;Logon Message&#xA;---------------------------&#xA;The user --- is currently logged on to this computer. If you continue this user's Windows Session will end and any un-saved data will be lost. Do you want to continue?&#xA;---------------------------&#xA;Yes   No&#xA;---------------------------" />
        </p>
        <p>
      Rather inconvenient.  Even worse, though, I've often been logged in and working
      remotely, when someone locally logs in.  No warnings or explanations, just *bam*
      disconnected!  (At least the first situation confirms the handover with both
      people.)
   </p>
        <p>
      For history:  Remote Desktop's daddy was Windows 2000 Server's <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/administration/terminal/tsremote.asp">Terminal
      Services in Remote Administration Mode</a>, which did allow (limited) concurrent
      sessions.  Microsoft added the console-session flexibility to XP's Remote
      Desktop, but dropped the concurrent sessions.  Then 2003 Server's (renamed) <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/tsremoteadmin.mspx">Remote
      Administration</a> wrapped in XP's console flexibility.  Later, XP's SP1
      promised concurrent access, then SP2 did.  Two strikes.  It <em>did </em>make
      an SP2 beta though, before being yanked later...
   </p>
        <p>
      The silver lining:  Thanks to <a href="http://www.msfn.org/board/lofiversion/index.php/t23719.html">the
      termsrv.dll from that SP2 beta</a>, it's possible to <a href="http://sig9.com/articles/concurrent-remote-desktop">hack
      XP for concurrent Remote Desktop sessions</a> in a few minutes.  Just change
      a registry setting, reboot to Safe Mode, replace the DLL, and boot back into homebrewed
      XP Remote Administration goodness.
   </p>
        <p>
      For the do-it-yourselfers:  Don't wait for Longhorn (<em>or whenever-they-may-get-to-it</em>): <a href="http://sig9.com/articles/concurrent-remote-desktop">here's
      the how-to article</a>, and <a href="http://www.msfn.org/board/lofiversion/index.php/t23719.html">here's
      the needed termsrv.dll file</a>.
   </p>
        <blockquote style="padding:0 2em;">Update:<br />
   I just stumbled on <a href="http://sala.pri.ee/?page_id=11">sala source's Terminal
   Server Patch, which wraps up the whole process in a single convenient patch</a>. 
   Very cool. </blockquote>
        <p>
       
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=c6931ebf-a160-492d-b645-ebbb82e6f255" />
        <br />
        <hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>Enable concurrent Remote Desktop sessions on Windows XP</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,c6931ebf-a160-492d-b645-ebbb82e6f255.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/04/29/Enable+Concurrent+Remote+Desktop+Sessions+On+Windows+XP.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 06:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   It's possible after all.&amp;nbsp; XP Pro's Remote Desktop can be &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hack_%28technology_slang%29"&gt;hack&lt;/a&gt;ed
   to give concurrent sessions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   To explain:&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/mobility/getstarted/remoteintro.mspx"&gt;Windows
   XP's Remote Desktop rocks&lt;/a&gt;, as does its ability to give me my console session later&amp;nbsp;(with
   my work uninterrupted) from another machine.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Glaring in its absence, though,
   is the ability to &lt;strong&gt;remotely&lt;/strong&gt;-rock &lt;em&gt;while &lt;/em&gt;someone is &lt;strong&gt;locally&lt;/strong&gt;-rocking
   the machine.&amp;nbsp; This can stink in a big way.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   For example, too often I've remotely logged in for something quick, only to see this
   nuisance:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=imgWrapper&gt;
   &lt;img src="/resources/XP_RD_unconcurrent.png" alt="---------------------------
Logon Message
---------------------------
The user --- is currently logged on to this computer. If you continue this user's Windows Session will end and any un-saved data will be lost. Do you want to continue?
---------------------------
Yes   No
---------------------------"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Rather inconvenient.&amp;nbsp; Even worse, though, I've often been logged in and working
   remotely, when someone locally logs in.&amp;nbsp; No warnings or explanations, just *bam*
   disconnected!&amp;nbsp; (At least the first situation confirms the handover with both
   people.)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   For history:&amp;nbsp; Remote Desktop's daddy was&amp;nbsp;Windows 2000 Server's &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/administration/terminal/tsremote.asp"&gt;Terminal
   Services in Remote Administration Mode&lt;/a&gt;, which did allow&amp;nbsp;(limited)&amp;nbsp;concurrent
   sessions.&amp;nbsp; Microsoft added the&amp;nbsp;console-session flexibility to XP's Remote
   Desktop, but dropped the concurrent sessions.&amp;nbsp; Then 2003 Server's (renamed) &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/tsremoteadmin.mspx"&gt;Remote
   Administration&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrapped in XP's console flexibility.&amp;nbsp; Later, XP's SP1
   promised concurrent access, then SP2 did.&amp;nbsp; Two strikes.&amp;nbsp; It &lt;em&gt;did &lt;/em&gt;make
   an SP2 beta though, before being yanked later...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   The silver lining:&amp;nbsp; Thanks to &lt;a href="http://www.msfn.org/board/lofiversion/index.php/t23719.html"&gt;the
   termsrv.dll from that SP2 beta&lt;/a&gt;, it's possible to &lt;a href="http://sig9.com/articles/concurrent-remote-desktop"&gt;hack
   XP for concurrent Remote Desktop sessions&lt;/a&gt; in a few minutes.&amp;nbsp; Just change
   a registry setting, reboot to Safe Mode, replace the DLL, and boot back into homebrewed
   XP Remote Administration goodness.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   For the do-it-yourselfers:&amp;nbsp; Don't wait for Longhorn (&lt;em&gt;or whenever-they-may-get-to-it&lt;/em&gt;): &lt;a href="http://sig9.com/articles/concurrent-remote-desktop"&gt;here's
   the how-to article&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.msfn.org/board/lofiversion/index.php/t23719.html"&gt;here's
   the needed termsrv.dll file&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote style="padding:0 2em;"&gt;Update:&lt;br /&gt;
I just stumbled on &lt;a href="http://sala.pri.ee/?page_id=11"&gt;sala source's Terminal
Server Patch, which wraps up the whole process in a single convenient patch&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;
Very cool. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=c6931ebf-a160-492d-b645-ebbb82e6f255" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,c6931ebf-a160-492d-b645-ebbb82e6f255.aspx</comments>
      <category>web/dev/tech;tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.throbs.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=4fd4289e-8cc3-47df-85f8-675f73d1aee2</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.throbs.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,4fd4289e-8cc3-47df-85f8-675f73d1aee2.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,4fd4289e-8cc3-47df-85f8-675f73d1aee2.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.throbs.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=4fd4289e-8cc3-47df-85f8-675f73d1aee2</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.hanselman.com/blog/MappingConnectingADriveLetterToAWebDAVOrFrontPageWebsite.aspx">Mapping/Connecting
      a Drive Letter to a WebDAV or Front Page website</a>
        </p>
   Update: 
   <p>
      Apparently Windows XP makes this possible through an integrated WebDAV client and
      updated <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/ServerHelp/dd619380-bb33-4d3a-b0b5-29c620600035.mspx">Net
      Use command</a>.  For icing: if you have a <a href="http://passport.com/">Passport</a>,
      you can map your online Documents folder to a drive letter with this command:<br /><code>net use * "http://www.msnusers.com/My Web Documents/Documents" /persistent:yes
      /user:UserName@passport.com</code></p><p><em>Tons</em> of cool possibilities with this...  (Now if we could just do the
      same with FTP!)
   </p><p>
      I just setup a webDAV-enabled website in IIS, enabled HTTPS, setup a couple virtual
      directories with pass-through authentication to my file server, and voila! thanks
      to the above trick, I can have secure, full-control remote access to it from anywhere.
   </p><p><em>Actually</em>, there was a lot of toil to the process, since there are a lot of
      bugs and tricky bits with DAV, HTTPS, and UNC Virtual Directories.  Here's useful
      info I found when wrestling my share of them...
   </p>
   WebDAV: 
   <ul><li><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=832161">You experience a delay when you
         use your Windows XP computer to log on to a domain or to connect to a network resource</a></li><li><a href="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/webdav-redirector-list.html">WebDAV Mini-Redirector
         (MRXDAV.SYS) Versions and Issues List</a></li><li><a href="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/">greenbytes WebDAV resources</a></li><li><a href="http://ulihansen.kicks-ass.net/aero/webdav/">Windows XP and Apache WebDAV,
         Password problems with webfolders</a></li></ul>
   HTTPS/SSL: 
   <ul><li><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q265847/">HTTPS/SSL - Error Message: The
         Page Cannot Be Displayed . . . Cannot Find Server or DNS Error</a></li></ul>
   Passthrough Authentication: 
   <ul><li><a href="http://forums.devarticles.com/archive/t-11624/problem-with-IIS6-passthrough-authentication">problem
         with IIS6 pass-through authentication</a>,</li><li>
         ...and the solution for me: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/technologies/webapp/iis/remstorg.mspx">Deploying
         and Configuring Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0 with Remotely Stored Content
         on UNC Servers and NAS Devices</a></li></ul>
   Web Folders: 
   <ul><li><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;892211">KB892211
         - Jan 25 2005 Software Update for Web Folders</a></li></ul><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=4fd4289e-8cc3-47df-85f8-675f73d1aee2" /><br /><hr />
   Copyright <a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt">Rob Eberhardt</a></body>
      <title>Mapping/Connecting a Drive Letter to a WebDAV or Front Page website</title>
      <guid>http://blog.throbs.net/PermaLink,guid,4fd4289e-8cc3-47df-85f8-675f73d1aee2.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.throbs.net/2005/02/23/MappingConnecting+A+Drive+Letter+To+A+WebDAV+Or+Front+Page+Website.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;a href="http://www.hanselman.com/blog/MappingConnectingADriveLetterToAWebDAVOrFrontPageWebsite.aspx"&gt;Mapping/Connecting
   a Drive Letter to a WebDAV or Front Page website&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
Update: 
&lt;p&gt;
   Apparently Windows XP makes this possible through an integrated WebDAV client and
   updated &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/ServerHelp/dd619380-bb33-4d3a-b0b5-29c620600035.mspx"&gt;Net
   Use command&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; For icing: if you have a &lt;a href="http://passport.com/"&gt;Passport&lt;/a&gt;,
   you can map your online Documents folder to a drive letter with this command:&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;code&gt;net use * "http://www.msnusers.com/My Web Documents/Documents" /persistent:yes
   /user:UserName@passport.com&lt;/code&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;em&gt;Tons&lt;/em&gt; of cool possibilities with this...&amp;nbsp; (Now if we could just do the
   same with FTP!)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I just setup a webDAV-enabled website in IIS, enabled HTTPS, setup a couple virtual
   directories with pass-through authentication to my file server, and voila! thanks
   to the above trick, I can have secure, full-control remote access to it from anywhere.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &lt;em&gt;Actually&lt;/em&gt;, there was a lot of toil to the process, since there are a lot of
   bugs and tricky bits with DAV, HTTPS, and UNC Virtual Directories.&amp;nbsp; Here's useful
   info I found when wrestling my share of them...
&lt;/p&gt;
WebDAV: 
&lt;ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=832161"&gt;You experience a delay when you
      use your Windows XP computer to log on to a domain or to connect to a network resource&lt;/a&gt;
   &lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/webdav-redirector-list.html"&gt;WebDAV Mini-Redirector
      (MRXDAV.SYS) Versions and Issues List&lt;/a&gt;
   &lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/"&gt;greenbytes WebDAV resources&lt;/a&gt;
   &lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://ulihansen.kicks-ass.net/aero/webdav/"&gt;Windows XP and Apache WebDAV,
      Password problems with webfolders&lt;/a&gt;
   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
HTTPS/SSL: 
&lt;ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q265847/"&gt;HTTPS/SSL - Error Message: The
      Page Cannot Be Displayed . . . Cannot Find Server or DNS Error&lt;/a&gt;
   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
Passthrough Authentication: 
&lt;ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://forums.devarticles.com/archive/t-11624/problem-with-IIS6-passthrough-authentication"&gt;problem
      with IIS6 pass-through authentication&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      ...and the solution for me: &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/technologies/webapp/iis/remstorg.mspx"&gt;Deploying
      and Configuring Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0 with Remotely Stored Content
      on UNC Servers and NAS Devices&lt;/a&gt;
   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
Web Folders: 
&lt;ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;892211"&gt;KB892211
      - Jan 25 2005 Software Update for Web Folders&lt;/a&gt;
   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.throbs.net/aggbug.ashx?id=4fd4289e-8cc3-47df-85f8-675f73d1aee2" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
Copyright &lt;a href="http://throbs.net/" title="Rob Eberhardt"&gt;Rob Eberhardt&lt;/a&gt; </description>
      <comments>http://blog.throbs.net/CommentView,guid,4fd4289e-8cc3-47df-85f8-675f73d1aee2.aspx</comments>
      <category>web/dev/tech;tools/tips/hacks</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>